Trump says shooter didn’t come near dinner room and talks about ‘near end’ to war with Iran

Donald Trump arrives to speak at the James Brady Press Room, at the White House, after a shooting outside the ballroom AP/José Luis Magana One day after the shooting attack at a dinner with journalists in Washington, President Donald Trump stated that the suspect was restrained before approaching the main venue of the event and did not go near the room where officials and guests were. In an interview with Fox News, Trump said that the man was “immediately stopped” by security forces and classified the episode as a test for a type of operation considered difficult to protect. According to him, events such as the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner bring together a large number of people and multiple accesses, which increases the logistical challenge for the teams responsible for security. The speech comes after the mobilization of Secret Service agents during the event, which ended with the suspect still being detained in the control areas. Earlier, experts consulted by the international press assessed that the response followed the expected protocol, with a focus on preventing the approach and removing authorities from immediate risk. Trump also commented on the suspect’s profile, saying that he was someone with a history of “a lot of hate” and that family members were already aware of previous difficulties. He also cited a manifesto attributed to the man, without detailing the content. Expert cites security failure at event with Trump Reinforced security and pressure on events with authorities The president acknowledged that ensuring security at meetings of this size is a complex task, especially when there is a concentration of authorities, journalists and support teams in the same environment. The assessment is in line with that of former security agents, who point out that closed events require multiple layers of protection, with screening, monitoring and rapid response to threats. In these scenarios, the central objective is to prevent the attacker’s advance before he reaches more sensitive areas — as occurred in Saturday’s episode. War with Iran enters the center of the interview Throughout the conversation, Trump alternated domestic topics with foreign policy and stated that the war with Iran could be close to an end. According to him, there are “reasonable” interlocutors on the Iranian side and negotiations can progress through direct contact, including by telephone. “If they want to talk, they can come to us or they can call us. There is a telephone. We have secure lines,” he said. The statements come at a time of diplomatic impasse. As g1 showed earlier, indirect negotiations are ongoing with Pakistan’s mediation, while a ceasefire remains in force, but without a definitive agreement. Trump also indicated that one of the conditions for ending the conflict involves the Iranian nuclear program, a central theme of tensions between the two countries. Criticism of allies and the international scenario The president also criticized the actions of international allies, stating that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) did not provide the expected support in the context of the conflict with Iran. He also mentioned the United Kingdom, saying that the promise of sending vessels after the end of the war would not be enough given the current scenario. The statements reinforce the tone of pressure adopted by Washington in the negotiations, while at the same time exposing differences between traditional partners at a time of geopolitical instability. China enters the radar, but with a more moderate tone When commenting on the broader international scenario, Trump also mentioned China, adopting a less critical tone than in previous statements. According to him, Beijing could have contributed more given the current global context, but avoided a tougher stance by stating that the country “could have been much worse”. The speech signals an attempt to calibrate the discourse in relation to China as the United States simultaneously deals with the war in the Middle East and tensions with traditional allies.

Source link