What happens now that the peace talks between Iran and the US have not reached an agreement?

by Syndicated News

What happens now that peace talks between Iran and the US have not reached an agreement AFP via Getty Images via BBC The end of peace talks between the United States and Iran without an agreement, in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, has cast doubt on the possibility of achieving lasting peace between the two countries. Before the talks that ended this Sunday (12/4), Pakistani government officials had been demonstrating optimism, highlighting that, unlike many others, the country enjoys the trust of both sides. 🗒️Do you have any reporting suggestions? Send to g1 The head of the US delegation, Vice President JD Vance, was also confident, but after negotiations that lasted into the early hours of Sunday, it was announced that there was no agreement. Fundamental disagreements over Iran’s nuclear program, among other sensitive points, would have led to the collapse of the talks. So what does this mean for the conflict and the options of the war’s main protagonists? See the videos that are trending on g1: See the videos that are trending on g1 Context The BBC’s head of international correspondents, Lyse Doucet, highlights that the negotiations in Islamabad were the highest level of talks between Iran and the United States since the 1979 Revolution. “It is not possible to do this type of diplomacy in one day,” says Doucet, adding that there were already signs, even before the talks began, that the process would not be quick. US President Donald Trump has consistently used harsh language, says Doucet. “‘Iran has been defeated. Iran must surrender.’ Vance reflected this when saying that they [Irã] they had to agree to our terms.” But Iran is unlikely to submit to ultimatums, and the country did not arrive in Islamabad ready to surrender, Doucet points out. “Iran arrived in Islamabad not thinking it had lost this war; in fact, he arrived thinking he was winning. He believes he has a strong position. It continues to retaliate and has managed to militarize the Strait of Hormuz,” the corridor in the Persian Gulf through which much of the world’s oil passes. What now? both sides,” says Hopton. “They talked for an unusually long period of the day. And the way the talks were conducted allowed for both detailed technical discussions and more general statements.” He says that although “maximalist” demands were presented by both parties in Islamabad and the distance between them is still great, the two sides seem to expect new talks to take place. “This deal — if there is one to be made eventually — will likely have new elements and will be more complex than even the 2015 deal,” he says, referring to the deal struck with Iran by then US President Barack Obama. Kasra Naji, special correspondent for BBC News’ Persian service, also suggests that “all is not lost.” “The head of the Iranian delegation at the talks, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, tweeted blaming the American side for failing to gain the trust of the Iranian delegation ‘during this round of talks’, leaving open the possibility of further negotiations,” writes Naji. BBC correspondent in Islamabad, Azadeh Moshiri. “But this may suggest that the door to mediation and back-channel talks is not completely closed.” An Iranian news agency, Tasnim, quoted a source as saying: “Iran is in no rush to negotiate.” of America.” suggest that Trump is considering a naval blockade of Iran following the collapse of talks — similar to what occurred before the ouster of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January. Perhaps in a nod to this, over the weekend, while negotiations were underway, a senior US military official released a statement on the establishment of a secure maritime corridor — through active route clearance actions — to unblock the Strait of Hormuz. Ultimately, the US president should be aware of two things, says correspondent Lyse Doucet. [um retorno à guerra] would be very unpopular at home.” Trump will be mindful of the domestic impact of any protracted global conflict — especially if the cost of living continues to rise just as the midterm elections approach in November. The latest consumer price index (CPI) — which measures the price of a basket of goods and services — is the highest in nearly two years, a worrying indication of what may be to come. “Second, it won’t work,” adds Doucet. “Iran will react.” This text was translated and reviewed by our journalists using AI assistance, as part of a pilot project

Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Este site usa cookies para melhorar a sua experiência. Presumimos que você concorda com isso, mas você pode optar por não participar se desejar Aceitar Leia Mais

Privacy & Cookies Policy

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.