Submarino Titan: Loss of hull integrity and security ‘seriously failure’ caused implosion, says final report

What is a ‘implosion’ and what happens when a submarine implodes? The Submarine Titan imploded that it was inadequately designed, and for “serious failures” of security protocols by the company Oceangate, the United States Coast Guard said in the final report on the implosion investigation, released on Tuesday (5). Also according to the American Coast Guard, the disaster that occurred in 2023 is considered preventable, and the main cause that led to the implosion of Titan was the loss of structural integrity of its carbon fiber hull. ✅ Click here to follow the G1 international news channel on Whatsapp Remember 💭 The Titan submarine disappeared on June 18, 2023 during an expedition to the wreckage of the Titanic ship. There were 5 people in the vehicle, then-executive director of Oceangate, Richard Stockton Rush, a co-pilot and three billionaires. According to the investigation, the vehicle imploded about 3,350 meters deep due to water pressure and all passengers died instantly. Remember the case here. The report also pointed out failures in submarine certification, maintenance and inspection processes, as well as “a toxic work culture in Oceangate.” See below for the causes listed by the American Coast Guard: Titan’s design and tests conducted by Oceangate have not followed basic engineering principles to build a hull tough enough to operate safely in high pressure environments; Oceangate did not properly investigate Titan’s weaknesses in expeditions prior to implosion, and continued to use submarine without adequate inspections after incidents that compromised hull integrity and other critical components; Oceangate did not study to determine the life of the Titan hull, and did not do preventive maintenance for a period of out of operation before the expedition to Titanic in 2023; Oceangate has excessively entrusted to a real -time monitoring system to evaluate the hoof condition, but did not properly analyze the data provided by this system; The design and construction of Titan’s carbon fiber hull, including aspects such as winding, healing, collage, hull thickness and manufacturing patterns, showed flaws that weakened the structure as a whole; The company kept a toxic work environment, in which it used experienced staff layoffs and the constant threat of dismissal to discourage employees and service providers raising safety concerns. The report released on Tuesday corroborates reports of weaknesses of the Titan submarine and negligence of Oceangate owners during testimonies of former public hearing company in 2024. The implosion of the Titan submarine, which occurred in 2023 during expedition to the wreckage of Titanic. Hearings on the implosion of the Titan submarine make up an American Coast Guard investigation on the case. The president of the Maritime Research Panel said that there is still more work to be done before a report with the conclusion of investigations and a list of recommendations is presented to the coastal guard leadership and later to the US government. Captain Jamie Frederick, commander of the Coast Guard Boston unit, seemed shocked to learn that the captain of the Titan support ship said he felt in retrospective a slight shake as the submersible imploded during the dive last year. Frederick said it was “inconceivable that they did not share it” as the searches were being performed between June 18 and 22, 2022. According to him, this “certainly would have changed the equation” in the rescue response employed by the coast guard. Also on Friday, an Oceangate employee witnessed that he resigned after a “tense” conversation in which Stockton Rush’s co -founder told him that the submarine would be recorded in the Bahamas and launched from Canada to prevent US supervision – and arrogantly discarded US regulatory concerns if she went to an American port. According to the employee, Matthew McCoy, Rush said to him, “If the coast guard became a problem, then he would buy a congressman to solve the issue.” STOCKTON RUSH IN A DATE IMAGE PUBLISHED ON THE Oceangate website Reproduction/Oceangate incidents and weaknesses of Titan Carbon fiber pressure hull from Titan was the theme of much of the discussion during the audience round. An expert witness, Roy Thomas, the lead engineer at American Bureau of Shipping, said that despite being a strong and light material-but it is difficult to make-carbon fiber is “susceptible to fatigue failures” under repeated pressurization and salt water can weaken material in many ways. Coast Guard officials observed during the audience that the submarine had not been reviewed independently, as is common practice. Oceangate co -founder Guillermo Sohnlein contested stating that Titan had certifications and bonds with NASA and space makers. NASA and Boeing employees said companies had limited roles in the Titan creation process: while NASA declined to be associated with an experimental submarine, Boeing moved away from Oceangate when Titan owners diverted from recommendations by them. Witnesses reported that they heard high sounds of cracks in previous descents. The National Transport Security Council engineer (NTSB) Don Kramer stated that Titan’s hull had imperfections that dating back to the manufacturing process and behaved differently after a “strong crash” was heard during a dive a year before the tragedy. New Images released from wreckage of the Titan submarine found by search teams on September 22, 2023. US coastal guard Oceangate’s former director David Lochridge said in testimony that the tragedy could have been avoided because he warned about great depths of the submarine in 2018, five years before implosion. Lochridge stated that he detected several flaws at Titan and elaborated, at the request of the Oceangate board, a submarine quality control report. Among the problems, the engineer pointed to the carbon fiber and said that the submarine had not been tested at the depth that would come down on the Titanic expedition. When he exposed them to the board and insisted on more testing on Titan he was fired. “In my opinion, until adequate corrective actions are in force and completed, Cyclops 2 (Titan) should not be manned at any of the next tests,” the then director in email sent to the Oceangate board said. Former Oceangate scientific director Steven Ross said in testimony that Titan fired only days before the expedition that resulted in the implosion. According to Ross, during diving the vessel became unstable due to a ballast problem, causing the passengers on board to be “thrown from side to side”, and took an hour to remove them from the water. In another statement, a passenger who paid for an expedition to Titanic in 2021 said the journey was aborted when the vessel began to present mechanical problems. “We realized that all he could do was spin in circles, curves on the right,” Fred Hagen said. “At this point, we would obviously not be able to navigate to Titanic.” He said Titan surfaced and the mission was canceled. Hagen said he was aware of the risks involved in the dive. “Anyone who wanted to go was or delirious if they didn’t think it was dangerous, or was accepting the risk,” he said. Holes in the titan submarine prototype carbon fiber layer after water pressure tests. US reproduction/coastal guard new images and last message during the audience round, new images of Titan’s wreckage were revealed. Among them, a video of the moment the submarine was found by the search teams. Also revealed was the last message sent from within the submarine to the surface support boat. “It’s okay,” said the message, written moments before implosion. Submarine titan housing found during implosion investigation. Image was revealed on September 16, 2024. Oceangate’s coastal guard of the US Navy and greed Oceangate director Tony Nissen told a statement that he refused to drive the submarine when Stockton Rush asked him because he didn’t trust the operations team. “I’m not going to get into it,” said Nissen at the time. Asked about security decisions and tests, Nissen also revealed that he was rushed to start operations that the pressure to put Titan in the water was “100%”. David Lochridge, the former director of operations, also said he felt used by Oceangate, who would have hired him to give scientific ballast to the company’s operations. “The company’s main goal was to make money. (…) There was very little in terms of science,” said Lochridge. Other reports also realize a company’s need to put the project into action as soon as possible, often ignoring expert guidelines. A former employee said the company was out of money, and the expeditions were the form of income to keep Oceangate working. Oceangate Director of Administration, Amber Bay, contested a question about a sense of “desperation” of the company to complete the dives due to the high price charged -client paid $ 250,000 (about $ 1.36 million) for the experience. Amber insisted that the company would not “perform dives that were risky just to meet a demand.” However, he told the Coast Guard panel: “There was definitely an urgency to fulfill what we had promised and a dedication and perseverance toward this goal.” Maritime Research Council President Jason Neubauer said the panel would complete his work to produce the report and press on changes in the form of coast guard leadership “to help ensure that no one has to face a similar occurrence in the future.” Neubauer stated that his recommendations to the commander will include security proposals, along with any criminal conduct. If the panel believes there has been criminal conduct, this recommendation will be dealt with in a separate process. “My priority is to solve this issue quickly, because I feel there are global issues at stake,” said Neubauer.

Source link