International silence about Trump’s trade war is the result of ‘rational dismantling’, experts say

The lack of an effective response from international organizations to unilateral tariffs and sanctions applied by US President Donald Trump to several countries is part of a “rational dismantling.” In a new statement, Trump mixes tariff with Bolsonaro and Lula responds to the assessment is experts heard by the G1, who highlight the lack of multilateral and scrapping of institutions. “We have observed in recent years the level of dismantling that the multilateral system has been suffering. In the case of tariffs, the WTO [Organização Mundial do Comércio] It would be the main body to curb US action, but the institution has been having a lack of operation since Trump’s first term, ”says International Relations Professor Cristina Pecequilo.“ This factor derives from a rational dismantling, a trend that began in Trump’s first term, which was not reversed by the Biden government. WTO’s performance has been weakened, which hinders the intervention of Trump’s protectionist actions, ”he adds. Since resumed the presidency in 2025, Trump has imposed a series of sanctions to other countries, including allies. The actions range from economic restrictions, such as tariffs, political actions, such as punishments to Brazilian officials and magistrates. Health, Alexandre Padilha, from the Minister and Brazilians Mozart Júlio Tabosa Sales, Secretary of the Ministry of Health, and Alberto Kleiman, former employee of the Federal Government. WTO at the beginning of the month, the Brazilian government filed a WTO against Trump’s tariff. The Brazilian government said that the United States “flagrantly” the commitments assumed by countries when they join the World Trade Organization. Entity and that commercial disputes should be resolved within the WTO. Supreme ”of the WTO. The agency is the final instance of judging international trade disputes within the organization. Becomes a kind of limbo. An alternative would have to be studied if there would be how to file a process within the US based on US legislation ”analyzes international law expert Pablo Bernardo. The action filed by Brazil must follow the following flow: Brazil requests dialogue with the US to try to resolve the conflict diplomatically (up to 60 days); The case; the decision of the panel: the group issues a report by saying whether or not the US violated the rules: the US may appeal – but the appeal, which would not work, is not working; But the construction of positioning may take time due to lack of agreement between countries, which depends on political, economic and geostrategic factors. The European Union when it has the opportunity to align with the United States, most of the time. So, I think Brazil should look for coalitions and overcoming these difficulties via South-South Coalitions, ‘says Pecequilo. Trump’s fare against Brics countries and their percentages Playing/GloboNews Positioning of the Brazilian government has committed efforts for a joint response with BRICS, a bloc that brings together Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. He talked to representatives from Russia, China and India. The most recent conversation was with Chinese leader XI Jinping on Monday (11). “The climate is relatively favorable, both China and India share criticism of US protectionism and defend the centrality of the WTO and the multilateral trade system as a way to resolve commercial disputes,” says “however, joint positioning depend on Reconciling distinct national priorities, not always convergent, ”he concludes. Trump and Putin are greeted in Alaska on Friday (15), for example, Trump held a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. While threatening Russia by taxing the BRICS, the American has acted as one of the negotiators of the conflict in Ukraine. and move part of diplomatic care to safety topics and geopolitical alignments, which could weaken cohesion around the commercial agenda. Still, it does not totally make a coordinated response unfeasible, provided that the group maintains focus on economic issues, ”says Apollinaria.

Source link