O tribunal permite que Trump mantenha o controle da Guarda Nacional da Califórnia – a política dos EUA ao vivo | Notícias dos EUA

by Marcelo Moreira

Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. I’m Tom Ambrose and will be bringing you the news over the next few hours.

“,”elementId”:”7966e979-bedf-4273-9c09-694d6f80bbe1″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

We start with the news that a US appeals court let Donald Trump retain control on Thursday of California’s national guard while the state’s Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the Republican president’s use of the troops to quell protests in Los Angeles.

“,”elementId”:”787019ae-213f-4186-848b-4ac4582640b7″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Trump’s decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on US soil and inflamed political tension in the country’s second most-populous city.

“,”elementId”:”37d6cb0b-8b13-461a-b2f9-303a7fae0e12″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit court of appeals extended its pause on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer’s 12 June ruling that Trump had unlawfully called the national guard into federal service.

“,”elementId”:”09f15ea3-4bfa-4061-bed8-9b8430e8c7a2″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Trump probably acted within his authority, the panel said, adding that his administration probably complied with the requirement to coordinate with Governor Gavin Newsom, and even if it did not, he had no authority to veto Trump’s directive.

“,”elementId”:”8a3c0973-8fad-43e9-b949-55f0a991d8d0″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

“And although we hold that the president likely has authority to federalize the national guard, nothing in our decision addresses the nature of the activities in which the federalized national guard may engage,” it wrote in its opinion.

“,”elementId”:”06564af7-a187-4b02-8d33-818e1417593e”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Newsom could still challenge the use of the national guard and U.S. Marines under other laws, including the bar on using troops in domestic law enforcement, it added. The governor could raise those issues at a court hearing on Friday in front of Breyer, it said.

“,”elementId”:”e57c54e8-2624-4e8c-ba95-2b081d8ea89b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

In a post on X after the decision, Newsom vowed to pursue his challenge.

“,”elementId”:”0469b1b2-0a7d-43d4-8ea9-db1aa4449406″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

“The president is not a king and is not above the law,” he said. “We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump’s authoritarian use of US military soldiers against our citizens.”

“,”elementId”:”45c8feb8-f739-4f6b-9a0a-7454c7150299″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Trump hailed the decision in a post on Truth Social. “This is a great decision for our country and we will continue to protect and defend law-abiding Americans,” he said.

“,”elementId”:”4cbb9419-030a-4e61-9783-dc840f68c303″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

“This is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should state and local police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.”

“,”elementId”:”5845bfa6-6774-4829-8bc0-d974553fd894″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

In other news:

“,”elementId”:”f9b36d54-1743-4557-a216-02f5053b6a54″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

    \n

  • \n

    The Los Angeles Dodgers said they blocked US immigration enforcement agents from accessing the parking lot at Dodger Stadium on Thursday and got into public back-and-forth statements with Ice and the Department of Homeland Security, which denied their agents were ever there.

  • \n

  • \n

    The Department of Homeland Security is now requiring lawmakers to provide 72 hours of notice before visiting detention centers, according to new guidance. The guidance comes after a slew of tense visits from Democratic lawmakers to detention centers amid Trump’s crackdowns in immigrant communities across the country.

  • \n

  • \n

    A federal judge on Thursday blocked Trump’s administration from forcing 20 Democratic-led states to cooperate with immigration enforcement in order to receive billions of dollars in transportation grant funding. Chief US district judge John McConnell in Providence, Rhode Island, granted the states’ request for an injunction barring the Department for Transportation’s policy, saying the states were likely to succeed on the merits of some or all of their claims.

  • \n

  • \n

    The office of the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, requested “a passive approach to Juneteenth messaging”, according to an exclusive Rolling Stone report citing a Pentagon email. The messaging request for Juneteenth – a federal holiday commemorating when enslaved Black people in Galveston, Texas, learned they were free – was transmitted by the Pentagon’s office of the chief of public affairs. This office said it was not poised to publish web content related to Juneteenth, Rolling Stone reported.

  • \n

  • \n

    Depending on who you ask, between 4 and 6 million people showed up to last weekend’s “No Kings” protests. Now the real number is becoming clearer, with one estimate suggesting that Saturday was among the biggest.

  • \n

“,”elementId”:”b956002a-f147-457a-8ef5-a7cb5814b520″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1750414127000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”11.08 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1750414109000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”11.08 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1750414127000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”11.08 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”11.08″,”title”:”Court lets Trump keep control of California national guard for now”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Fri 20 Jun 2025 11.42 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Fri 20 Jun 2025 11.08 BST”}],”filterKeyEvents”:false,”id”:”key-events-carousel-mobile”,”absoluteServerTimes”:false,”renderingTarget”:”Web”}”>

Eventos -chave

Edward Helmore

Donald Trump negou um relatório no Wall Street Journal de que ele aprovou os planos de atacar o Irã, dizendo que a agência de notícias “não tem idéia” qual é o seu pensamento sobre o conflito de Israel-Irã.

Ele também confirmou, mais tarde na quinta -feira, através de seu secretário de imprensa, que ele estaria tomando uma decisão nas “próximas duas semanas”.

A revista informou Na quarta -feira, Trump disse aos assessores seniores um dia antes que ele havia aprovado os planos de ataque, mas estava atrasando a ordem final para ver se Teerã abandonaria seu programa nuclear. O relatório citou três funcionários anônimos.

Na quinta -feira, Trump respondeu ao relatório, Postando sobre a verdade social: “O Wall Street Journal não tem idéia do que meus pensamentos são sobre o Irã!”

Mas a decisão de Trump depende de se o enorme penetrador de munições (MOP) destruiria o local de enriquecimento de urânio de Fordw, disse uma autoridade dos EUA Axios. Fordow, que é embutido em uma montanha ao sul de Teerã, é alvo de Israel, mas eles não têm as “bombas de bunker-buster” e aeronaves necessárias para destruí-lo; Os EUA têm acesso a ambos.

“Estaremos prontos para atacar o Irã. Ainda não estamos convencidos de que somos necessários. E queremos ser desnecessários, mas acho que o presidente ainda não está convencido de que ainda somos necessários”, disse uma autoridade dos EUA à loja.

Compartilhar

Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Este site usa cookies para melhorar a sua experiência. Presumimos que você concorda com isso, mas você pode optar por não participar se desejar Aceitar Leia Mais

Privacy & Cookies Policy